Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/4/c/9/iconara.net/httpd.www/blog/wp-content/advanced-cache.php:1) in /customers/4/c/9/iconara.net/httpd.www/blog/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Keep up the good work :)]]>
I really liked your articles and you make lot of good points. I feel cairngorm is so widely used and supported by Adobe because of the fundamental fact that Adobe guys are not really good at object oriented paradigms. They have an eye for good UI design but lack architectural design insight to understand the down side of many things that you raise here like service locator and model locator.]]>
I’m new to Flex and Cairngorm.While I’m using ServiceLocator,I do run into the problem: Error: C0001E: Only one ServiceLocator instance can be instantiated.
My Code is like this:
In Delegate.as,I have snippets:
this.service = ServiceLocator.getInstance().getHTTPService(“statistServ”);
In Main.xml,snippets like:
this wonderful little Error message pops up the minute I load a second instance of some module which requires httpservice.
Is there any way to resolve this problem without switching to another Framework?
Shuo from China]]>
What other measure than quality is there?
I think each good framework can be employed to attain a good quality once the person doing the job got a piece of brain in the pocket.
Well, yeah. But that’s an empty statement. A good framework can be used to make good applications by good programmers. Go figure. What else are you doing but a judgement of quality when you say that? Now, what about a bad framework, or should I say a low quality framework?
Of course a good programmer can make good software with bad tools, but it’s very unlikely that you would get many good programmers by picking a bad tool. The good programmers are good partly because they can tell good from bad, they know quality, and they tend to use the good tools.
Now, that last piece could be interpreted in two ways in the light of the number of Flex developers that work with Cairngorm. I will let you guess which interpretation I think is right. A hint is that quality is not decided by majority vote.]]>
Fair enough, if quality is of no concern.]]>
i agree that mate is more promising but:
u can find more developers having experience (so called bad habits) in cairngorm than mate
mate is still in beta while cairngorm last bug fixed 2 years ago(believe me its not too funny to accidentaly found memoryleaks in framework after 6 month of development)]]>