<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google isn&#8217;t indexing dynamic content (yet)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom H</title>
		<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iconara.net/?p=241#comment-7157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What I&#039;m worried about now is will the Flash content of a progressively-enhanced site be used instead of the good &#039;ol HTML? I hope Google have a mechanism in place for deciding if it&#039;s best they crawl the Flash, the HTML, or both.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m worried about now is will the Flash content of a progressively-enhanced site be used instead of the good &#8216;ol HTML? I hope Google have a mechanism in place for deciding if it&#8217;s best they crawl the Flash, the HTML, or both.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arul</title>
		<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>Arul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iconara.net/?p=241#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google do not index the dynamic contents. Because dynamic contents are invisible to google crawler eyes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google do not index the dynamic contents. Because dynamic contents are invisible to google crawler eyes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jensa</title>
		<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jensa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iconara.net/?p=241#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,
I interviewed Justin about this some time ago. You can find details here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.flashmagazine.com/News/detail/swfs_to_become_fully_searchable/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;J&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,
I interviewed Justin about this some time ago. You can find details here:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flashmagazine.com/News/detail/swfs_to_become_fully_searchable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flashmagazine.com/News/detail/swfs_to_become_fully_searchable/</a></p>

<p>J</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7136</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iconara.net/?p=241#comment-7136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Nuno&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unless the deep linking implementation assumes that EI will always be available there should be no problem, I&#039;m thinking more of applications that are integrated with Ajax-based applications on the same page, or for other reasons don&#039;t work if EI is not available. If a site works in the standalone Flash Player it should be OK.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nuno</p>

<p>Unless the deep linking implementation assumes that EI will always be available there should be no problem, I&#8217;m thinking more of applications that are integrated with Ajax-based applications on the same page, or for other reasons don&#8217;t work if EI is not available. If a site works in the standalone Flash Player it should be OK.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno Rosa</title>
		<link>http://blog.iconara.net/2008/07/27/why-google-isnt-indexing-dynamic-content-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7135</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iconara.net/?p=241#comment-7135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Any calls to ExternalInterface will fail,(...)&quot;
Hope not, because even if google indexes some content most of it will use EI for deeplinking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;(...)how will the indexer be able to discern which display objects that act as buttons?(...)&quot;
My guess is that their approach might be to crawl the display list looking for InteractiveDisplayObject descendants and if they have any listeners subscribing mouse events, triggers it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Adobe should release more info on how the &quot;player&quot; interacts with content, for now, that&#039;s more important than what is or what isn&#039;t indexed. The announcement was more to create the hype inside the community, let&#039;s see what comes next.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any calls to ExternalInterface will fail,(&#8230;)&#8221;
Hope not, because even if google indexes some content most of it will use EI for deeplinking.</p>

<p>&#8220;(&#8230;)how will the indexer be able to discern which display objects that act as buttons?(&#8230;)&#8221;
My guess is that their approach might be to crawl the display list looking for InteractiveDisplayObject descendants and if they have any listeners subscribing mouse events, triggers it.</p>

<p>Adobe should release more info on how the &#8220;player&#8221; interacts with content, for now, that&#8217;s more important than what is or what isn&#8217;t indexed. The announcement was more to create the hype inside the community, let&#8217;s see what comes next.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
